As a famous character from an English classic once said, "To Agile or Waterfall, that is the question..." 😊 Different projects require different management approaches. Nevertheless, in the global practice of project management, two completely opposite approaches have emerged: Waterfall and Agile methodologies. Despite their differences, both aim for the same end goal.
‍

Choose Your Fighter: Agile vs. Waterfall

Agile is not just a methodology; it's a philosophy of project management aimed at achieving flexibility in organizational work. This philosophy is based on 12 fundamental principles, developed in 2001 and presented in the Agile Manifesto. At its core, Agile encourages flexible work approaches and readiness to quickly adapt to changes during product creation to deliver value to the customer.

On the other hand, the Waterfall model is a linear project management methodology that relies on strict adherence to pre-planned stages. This model requires thorough planning and sequential execution of each development phase. Waterfall was first applied in fields like construction and manufacturing, where the structured nature of physical projects demanded tight control over each stage. The main stages of the Waterfall model include initiation (gathering and documenting requirements), analysis, design (or development), testing, implementation, and ongoing product support.

Although Agile was initially designed for software development and Waterfall for manufacturing, both approaches are now widely used in knowledge-based project management across various industries. Agile teams typically adapt faster to changes during the project lifecycle, while Waterfall is better suited for projects with well-defined requirements and a detailed work plan from the start.

Let's explore six key parameters that differentiate Agile and Waterfall models in project management:

1. Client Involvement in Agile vs. Waterfall Projects According to the first principle of the Agile Manifesto, the core objective is customer satisfaction. To meet client expectations effectively, Agile projects require continuous interaction with customers at all stages of development. The client's input drives progress in Agile projects, acting as the key factor in project management. In Waterfall, however, customer interaction is limited—feedback is typically requested only at the initial stage, when requirements are defined, and in the final stage, after most work is completed, like during the product launch.
2. Changing Requirements in Agile vs. Waterfall
   In a classic Waterfall project, the initiation phase involves gathering and documenting all project requirements. This phase results in a clearly defined list of requirements, which serves as the input for subsequent phases. In Agile projects, the approach is entirely different. Changes in client expectations or market fluctuations are welcomed, and teams aim to integrate these changes throughout the development process. Agile philosophy promotes flexibility and adaptation to evolving conditions, allowing for product and process improvements.
3. Scope of Work in Agile vs. Waterfall
   Similar principles apply to changes in project scope. Agile projects are highly flexible regarding the scope of work. To respond effectively to changes, Agile teams work at a steady, constant pace, regularly delivering partial results and gathering immediate feedback from the client. However, for clearly defined projects with strict requirements and standards, the Waterfall model is better suited. In Waterfall, once the scope is set, planning and tracking progress become much simpler compared to Agile's flexible approaches.
4. Work Prioritization in Agile vs. Waterfall
   Agile’s flexibility allows teams to focus on one key goal: "customer satisfaction through early and continuous delivery of products," as stated in the Agile Manifesto. Task prioritization is based on customer feedback, and project tasks can change according to client needs. Thanks to this process, Agile teams can continuously create and deliver value to customers throughout the project. In contrast, the Waterfall model focuses on completing pre-established tasks and goals. Since the model follows a strict sequence of stages, changes in requirements at later phases can significantly increase the risk of project failure or inefficiency.
5. Agile Teams vs. Waterfall Teams
   Teams working in an Agile framework focus on flexibility and the ability to adapt to changes at any project stage. Agile team members have the freedom to organize their work and are responsible for the final result. Feedback is highly valued in Agile teams, encouraging accountability and engagement among all team members. In contrast, Waterfall teams emphasize task completion, where individual members may only work on one project phase, limiting their interaction and coordination with other team members.
6. Planning in Agile vs. Waterfall
   Waterfall projects are planned using a traditional project management approach, where key success factors are strict deadlines and clearly defined work scope. In Agile, however, the planning process remains flexible, allowing for adjustments during project execution. In knowledge-based projects, critical changes may arise even in later stages, and the Agile approach allows these changes to be incorporated at any stage of the project.
   ‍

A Universal Tool for Methodology Selection: The Stacey Matrix

When choosing between the Waterfall model and Agile approaches, the Stacey Matrix can be a helpful tool. It helps evaluate the predictability of project requirements and methods along two axes:

• Do you understand what needs to be done? (Requirements axis)
• Are you confident in how to do it? (Technology axis)

If both answers are yes, you're in luck: in this case, you don't need to apply flexible methodologies. You may not even need any specialized project management tools, as you know exactly what and how to do—it’s just a matter of following the plan.

If you're unsure about task execution or methods, you're in the "complexity" zone of the matrix. In such cases, a project can be executed using the Waterfall model, but some Agile elements, such as Kanban or Scrum, may also be applied.

When uncertainty arises in the requirements axis, the risks in planning scope, timelines, and budget significantly increase. In this case, it’s advisable to reduce one of these variables to lower overall project complexity. Generally, it’s easiest to limit timelines using methods like sprints to reduce time pressure and simplify project management.

If the project falls into the "chaotic" zone of the matrix, there’s a serious problem. At this point, you don’t know what to do or how to do it. It’s recommended to temporarily pause the project, step back, and reassess the goals and objectives to avoid creating an inefficient product with budget and timeline overruns.

By positioning your project on the Stacey Matrix, you can choose the appropriate project management methodology and confidently move forward.
‍

The Human Factor as the Main Challenge

Many projects involve complex tasks and large teams. When people are involved, situations are rarely straightforward. Given this, it’s worth revisiting the Stacey Matrix and reframing the key questions:

• How confident are you in understanding what needs to be done? (Requirements axis)
• How confident are you in knowing how to do it? (Technology axis)

However, people often tend to overestimate or underestimate their knowledge and risks. This is why gambling, like poker, is so popular: evaluating the probability of winning is based on subjective judgments, which are often wrong.
‍

The Illusion of Checklists

There is a temptation to remove the human factor from methodology selection by creating a clear checklist with criteria. However, these checklists must account for organizational specifics, as they inevitably reflect the personal biases of their creators. Even artificial intelligence can inherit cognitive or cultural biases from its creators, as research has shown.

Organizations that tend to minimize risks are more likely to develop checklists favoring the Waterfall approach for complex projects, even if a flexible methodology would be more effective.

Checklists can be useful but become less effective when dealing with people or when circumstances change. Strict criteria quickly become outdated in a constantly changing world. Goals set at the beginning of the year often lose relevance by mid-year and may be completely obsolete by year’s end.
‍

People as the Solution

The best way to determine the approach for a new project is to simplify its complexity. Fortunately, people have exceptional abilities to simplify complex tasks. This was the foundation of the industrial revolution led by Frederick Taylor and Henry Ford and continues to be a key aspect of successful project management.

Leverage this ability by analyzing the Stacey Matrix questions. It’s hard to assess an entire large-scale project involving hundreds of people over many years, but it’s much easier to evaluate individual functions or tasks.

However, it’s important to keep personal biases in mind. To minimize their influence, involve more people from different departments and functions in the decision-making process. This helps form a more objective opinion and reduces the impact of personal views and beliefs.
‍

Conclusion

The choice between Agile and Waterfall methodologies depends on the unique needs of the project and its environment. Agile is better suited for projects with high uncertainty, requiring flexibility and constant adaptation. It offers the opportunity to involve the client at every stage of development, ensuring quick responses to changes. Waterfall, on the other hand, provides a clear structure and sequence, making it useful for projects with well-defined requirements and a stable scope of work.

Each methodology has its advantages and risks, and the choice should be based on factors such as requirement complexity, the level of uncertainty, and the importance of client interaction. Tools like the Stacey Matrix help evaluate the project and make the right decision, relying on the understanding of requirements and methods. Remember, there is no universal solution—project success depends on how well the chosen methodology fits the project's context and goals.

‍